The New York TimesOctober 18, 2008
Troubles for New York HotelsBy
CHARLES V. BAGLIThe city’s hotels, whose 77,000 rooms have been packed with record-setting numbers of visitors from Germany, Hong Kong and Peoria, are starting to feel the slowing economy.
Until recently, tourism had been a bright spot in the city’s increasingly gloomy economic picture, fueled largely by foreign tourists taking advantage of a weak dollar.
But many hotel operators have begun reporting that bookings for the next few months, traditionally the strongest part of the year, are falling below last year’s levels. Cancellations are also on the rise, and corporate travel executives are negotiating for steeper discounts on room contracts for 2009.
“We’re already seeing cancellations,” said Vijay Dandapani, chief operating officer for Apple Core Hotels, which has five budget hotels in Manhattan with a total of almost 800 rooms. “There’s hesitancy in bookings. We hold our breath and fill up rooms at the last minute. Occupancy has been weaker in October, traditionally one of the strongest months.”
John Fitzpatrick, president of Fitzpatrick Hotels, an Irish chain, said that the three hotels he operates in Manhattan were nearly full Wednesday night, but that he was seeing a “slowdown in November bookings, with people canceling or holding back.” He said that he was redrawing his budget for next year in anticipation of a decline, and that he had postponed finishing a $4 million renovation of one hotel, the Fitzpatrick Grand Central.
For the first time since 2001, the effective cost of a New York hotel room for a European traveler is going up, because the dollar has gained strength against the euro in recent weeks, according to the Hotel Association of New York City. At the same time, a recessionary wave has started to move across Europe.
American companies under financial pressure are also placing greater restrictions on corporate travel.
The situation is not yet dire. Although Apple Core’s occupancy is down 10 percentage points from over 90 percent during the same period last year, it is still better than in most other American cities.
But no one knows whether it is a temporary or long-term trend. Mr. Dandapani, Mr. Fitzpatrick and other operators fear that falling bookings and rising cancellations hint at a downturn for one of the city’s most robust industries. Hotels have been full more than 200 days a year for four years, and the average room rate has soared 48 percent since 2004 to $302.52 last year, according to PKF Consulting, a national research and hotel advisory firm.
“The last two weeks have seen occupancy drop substantially over the same period last year,” said John A. Fox, senior vice president at PKF. “We are way down, but down to levels other cities would give their right arm for.”
The average occupancy rate at New York hotels was 86.5 percent last year, and had been on pace to be higher this year. In August, for instance, it was 92.4 percent, up from 90.1 percent in August 2007, according to PKF Consulting. The average room rate, $304.52 in 2007, was the highest in the nation, but New York also faces higher operating and fuel costs.
New York hotels have benefited in recent years from the city’s international popularity and a deluge of foreign and domestic visitors, which topped a record 46 million last year, according to NYC & Company, the convention and visitors bureau. From 2003 to 2007, the number of international visitors grew by 83 percent.
Even when domestic tourism began to fall off this year, foreigners picked up the slack. In August, 5 percent fewer people arrived at New York-area airports from other American cities compared with a year earlier, but the decline was offset somewhat by a modest increase in foreign travelers, according to the
Port Authority of New York and New Jersey.
But that now appears to be changing.
“Our hotels have experienced few cancellations,” said Michael J. Stengel, vice president of Marriott Hotels in New York City, which includes 21 hotels and about 7,000 rooms. “But as you look forward, demand is starting to soften for the fourth quarter. Even some of the international travel is starting to soften.”
Jonathan Tisch, chairman of Loews Hotels, which operates the 400-room
Loews Regency on Park Avenue at 61st Street, is also worried about the future. “My sense is that we’ll be O.K. through the holidays,” Mr. Tisch said. “My real concern is what happens after the first of the year.”
Yet the number of hotels continues to increase. About a dozen hotels were expected to open this year, according to a report by NYC & Company. The report projects that 37 more, with more than 7,000 rooms, will open in 2009.
“There are a lot of potential hotels supposedly opening in 2009,” Mr. Stengel said, “but we think a lot of those will be delayed.”
The hotel trade association is also worried about talk in the City Council of raising the city’s hotel tax, already one of the highest in the country, at a time when New York faces a $2 billion budget gap. With the help of the Bloomberg administration, hotel operators blocked a similar proposal in June.
Lewis A. Fidler, a city councilman from Brooklyn who supports raising the tax, said a one-point increase would raise $70 million annually. “The idea of not reaching into the pocket of foreign tourists before reaching into the pocket of New Yorkers is offensive,” Mr. Fidler said.
But Joseph Spinnato, president of the hotel association, said, “We feel very strongly that any tax increase would be detrimental to the industry and the city.”
A report by Sean Hennessey of Lodging Investment Advisors, commissioned by the hotel association, argues that even a one-point increase in the city’s 14.54 percent hotel tax could cause a loss of more than $533 million in sales and 3,716 jobs.
In the early 1990s, the hotel industry waged a successful battle to cut the tax to less than 15 percent from 21.25 percent. In the years that followed, occupancy increased and the average room rate rose faster than inflation. But one hotel analyst suggested that it had more to do with a thriving economy and New York’s popularity than with a lower tax.
Copyright 2008 The New York Times Company